Exploring the fundamental flaws of fundamentalist thought
Science
Did the Devil Make You Do It?
Nov 16th
There are probably few topics which have been more contentious in religious discussions than that of the nature of evil. Are we essentially good beings that are led astray by a malevolent influence, or are we naturally evil creatures who require divine guidance to become good? This question has plagued humanity since we first became cognizant enough to ponder the true nature of good and evil. If we examine the mythologies of various cultures throughout human history, it becomes quite apparent that this philosophical quandary has been personified through any number of deities, spirits, demons, heroes, and villains.
In our modern western culture, this conflict has perhaps been simplified to its purest form through our depictions of a benevolent god and malevolent devil locked in some sort of endless conflict for our immortal souls. Although this allegorical concept may be satisfying on a dramatic and poetic level, I believe it to be inherently dangerous to society.
In order to explain this point, it is necessary to briefly discuss the question of the origins of religious belief.
This is by no means an easy question to answer, as religion seems to have always been a part of humanity. We can attempt to trace the evolution of belief back through our history, but its origins become obscured in the fog of antiquity. In many ways, it seems almost counterproductive. In evolutionary terms, it is quite expensive and yields no obvious benefits to our survival as a species. However, the fact that it seems to be an intrinsic aspect of human nature implies that its origins must have somehow been beneficial to our species at some point in our development.
Anthropologist Pascal Boyer provided an excellent theory on this subject. In an effort to understand the evolutionary origins of religion, he distilled the mythology, dogma, and philosophies of all religions down to their most basic components. He payed particularly close attention to the beliefs of preliterate cultures, as their beliefs were less likely to have been cross-contaminated with those of others. After a great deal of work, he was able to find only one unifying theme that permeated all known religious beliefs, both past and present.
What Boyer found was that all religions contain a belief in “the presence of unseen agents in the environment”. These agents were often used to explain the causation of certain natural phenomenon. However, the most prevalent beliefs seemed to imply that these spirits were malevolent entities that wished to bring some sort of harm to their unsuspecting victims… much like the devils and demons of our modern mythologies.
It is this simple fact that shines a light on the evolutionary origins of belief. Like all primates, sight is our primary sense. We do not have the heightened sense of smell or hearing that so many of our mammalian cousins enjoy. Since our species evolved in the canopies of African rain forests, sight proved to be the most effective sense to use from our high vantage points. As such, our ability to survive was entirely dependent on our ability to see potential dangers. If we could not see predators in time to take the necessary evasive actions, we would not survive to pass on our genes to the next generation.
This obviously put our ancestors at a distinct disadvantage in situations in which they were not able to see potential dangers. In darkness or in the dense foliage of the ground, they were little more than an easy meal for any of the larger, faster, carnivorous creatures that preyed upon them. Essentially, that which they could not see could easily cause their gruesome demise.
The connection to Boyer’s “unseen agents” now becomes quite clear. The primates who had an innate fear of the invisible did not venture into situations where their sight would be limited, whereas those who had no such fear didn’t survive for very long. In this instance, natural selection favored a primal form of superstition. Millions of years of selection hard-wired it into our ever growing hominid minds.
From an evolutionary point of view, old habits die hard. We’ve been bipedal for a few million years now, yet we still suffer from many of the problems caused by our transition from our ancient quadrupedal forms. In much the same way, our giant sentient brains still fall prey to one of our most basic primal fears… unseen malevolent entities.
Our modern understanding of psychology has shed a great deal of light onto what we have traditionally categorized as good and evil. The human brain has an unparalleled ability to experience empathy, an intellectual understanding of the feelings of others. It is our ability to feel empathy that has formed the very foundation of human society. By understanding the wants and needs of others, we are able to peacefully function in larger communities. This leads to the sort of individual specialization that allows us to function as a greater whole and achieve far more than any individual member of our species ever could alone. By utilizing our advanced sense of empathy, we commit acts of altruism which often benefit others more than ourselves. This is, in essence, what most would define as “good”.
In contrast, we still possess our primal instincts (the aspect of our psyche that is often referred to as “the lizard brain”). This is an even more ancient form of hard-wiring. It represents the most basic needs an organism has to survive and pass on its genes. The lizard brain gladly kills, steals, and rapes to serve its own self-interest, as it does not concern itself with the needs of others. In modern humanity, we define these characteristics as “evil”. While they served our very ancient ancestors, they are detrimental to a species that is dependent on its need to function as a society.
When we examine good and evil in this light, it becomes quite easy to see why the belief that evil is caused by the influence of an external, malevolent entity is fundamentally dangerous. By personifying evil as something which exists outside of ourselves, we provide ourselves with the false comfort of believing that it is not an intrinsic part of our psyche.
Given the right set of circumstances, any one of us is quite capable of abandoning our sense of empathy and reverting to our most primal instincts. It is essential for us to realize this and understand that we alone bear the responsibilities for our own actions. When we cling to our archaic notions of demons and devils, we create a sort of loophole. We tell ourselves that the evil that we do is no fault of our own… that we are somehow little more than the hapless puppets of some imagined demonic entity. Once we become convinced that anything else bears the responsibility for our actions, there is no limit to the atrocities we could allow ourselves to commit.
Many of the faithful will surely argue that they will never commit any such atrocities, as their faith in an all-powerful benevolent entity shields them from the influences of evil beings. This sort of thinking is even more dangerous, as the believer has engaged in a sort of magical thinking. The belief that our attachment to a good being protects us from the influence of evil is an incredibly dangerous rationalization… “Because I have faith, I am righteous. Because I am righteous, I am good. Because I am good, my actions are not evil.” This is the twisted logic that has led to countless atrocities committed throughout human history in the name of any number of gods.
We have reached a stage in our evolution in which we have the cognitive ability to understand the true nature of evil. It is not something that is forced upon us by malevolent entities, but rather the result of any number of factors which damage our psyche to an extent to which we abandon our empathy and revert to our more primal nature. It is time for us to cast aside the imagined ghosts of our primitive ancestors and embrace a rational view of what makes us good or evil. Only by doing this can we hope to overcome the demons of our minds and strive to create a world in which we truly embrace that which is good for all humanity.
PhACT presents Dr. Paul Halpern: Saturday, October 17th
Oct 8th
On Saturday, October 17th, the Philadelphia Association for Critical Thinking will be hosting a talk with Dr. Paul Halpern at the Community College of Philadelphia.
Paul Halpern is a physicist, author, and advocate for the popularization of science at the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia. He has written twelve popular science books, including “What’s Science Ever Done for Us?: What The Simpsons Can Teach Us About Physics, Robots, Life, and the Universe”.
He will be discussing his latest book, “Collider: The Search For the World’s Smallest Particles”.
Saturday, October 17th
2:00 PM
Community College of Philadelphia
Center for Business and Industry
C2-28 Lecture Room
More info can be found at…
http://atheists.meetup.com/215/
http://www.amazon.com/Paul-Halpern/e/B001IGFMLM/ref=sr_tc_2_0
The wisdom of children
Jul 12th
Today was a beautiful day in Philadelphia. Like all beautiful Sundays in the summer, I went down to the farmer’s market on Second Street. After walking through the market, I like to sit by the fountain and enjoy a cup of coffee.
It’s always fun to see the pure unadulterated joy children experience while at play. I defy anyone to not smile while watching them shout with glee as they twirl through a plume of water on a sunny day. Kids wear their emotions on their sleeves. They have yet to develop a barrier between their conscious and subconscious.
This led me to ponder the inquisitive nature of children. They are natural scientists, always observing and questioning the world around them. In fact, I have heard that children ask an average of half a million questions by the age of five. It seems that this type of critical inquiry is an inherent aspect of human nature.
Why, then, is this tendency so often suppressed as we get older? At what point do we begin to simply accept easy answers and stifle our need to ask more questions?
I suppose it might have something to do with the regimented, institutionalized fashion in which children are educated in our society.
I know I’m not making an argument that hasn’t been made by thousands of others before. There are many people in our society who are fighting to change the way our educational system works. However, I think there are far more people who simply accept the way our schools have worked for decades (if not centuries).
The inquisitive nature of children is a clear indication that education is an incredibly organic process. Children want to learn. They want to understand the world around them. Why do we not simply encourage this and guide them when necessary?
Instead, our traditional methods of schooling have a strict curriculum that dogmatically clings to a very specific list of things that we have decided children are supposed to learn at a specific age. Instead of nurturing their natural thirst for knowledge and guiding them towards these things, we line them up in rows, subdivide them by our perception of their intellect, and force feed them facts. Is it any wonder that so many children begin to despise school at such an early age?
Of course, schools that take a non traditional approach to education do exist, but they are unfortunately usually reserved for the privileged few who can afford them. The children of the poor and working class are usually just filed through a generic, sterile, rubber-stamp school system. It’s little wonder that these students rarely excel, often failing to even complete their schooling. This is an incredible tragedy that repeats itself on a daily basis in our society.
Nothing will ever change until we, as a society, decide that the system must change. Sadly, we often seem to be too self centered or apathetic to take an interest in such things. We rarely foster a sense of responsibility for others in our society.
There is, of course, another killer of a child’s natural inquisitiveness… the dogmatic juggernaut we call “religion”. In my humble opinion, it’s almost criminal to answer a child’s questions about our universe with “God did it”, “It’s all part of God’s plan”, and “Don’t question the will of God”. Essentially, religion is the natural enemy logic, reason, and progress… the very qualities we should be fostering in children.
There’s a saying that’s quite popular among atheists: “Philosophy is questions that cannot be answered… Religion is answers that cannot be questioned.” A truer statement has never been uttered.
In reality, every answer we find creates more questions. This is a good thing, as we must always strive toward a greater understanding of our world. However, people are often far too happy to avoid the ongoing quest for knowledge by forcing themselves to accept easy answers. Personally, I have never understood this. The universe is far too amazing to dismiss as the creation of an omnipotent being.
Children know this. They have the drive to understand everything. They know that every answer creates more questions, and they fearlessly ask these questions.
Why would we want to program them to stop this quest? Why would we want to crush them with dogma of religion and the drudgery of institutionalized education?
Maybe it’s simply easier for us. However, the fact that it is easy doesn’t make it right.
Gay marriage vs. nuclear physics
Jun 10th
I am going to start out this post by assuming that you are scratching your head in some futile attempt to figure out how there could be any possible correlation between gay marriage and nuclear physics. I don’t blame you. Until today, I had absolutely no idea that the two subjects were related. It seems that I was, in fact, quite wrong.
I was enlightened by a brilliant analogy put forth in an op-ed piece written by Timothy Dalrymple, an evangelical contributor to Patheos.com. He so eloquently expressed why gay marriage is not only wrong, but apparently violates the laws of physics…
We can no more revise the basis of marriage than we can revise the laws governing atoms. Societies may shape marriage differently, but the intrinsic need of male and female for each other is written into the created order.
Did that statement just make your brain hurt? Don’t worry if it did, as that is only an indication that you have a healthy, rational mind. Apart from being little more than typical theological drivel, it contains one of the most egregiously false analogies of all time.
First, let’s examine exactly what marriage is. It is not an intrinsic aspect of nature. It is not governed by any natural laws. It is a societal construct. In essence, it is not a thing that actually exists by itself. It only exists because we, as a society, accept that it exists. Therefor, marriage is what any given group, be it a community, a church, or a government, defines it to be.
If we want to bring natural laws into this debate, then we should be clear about one thing. Natural laws do not govern marriage… they govern sexual attraction. It is true that the most common form of sexual attraction is between a male and female. If this were not the case, our species would have died out long ago. However, male/female sexual attraction is by no means the only form. Attraction between two individuals of the same sex is quite common throughout the natural world. While it does not serve the vital role of perpetuating the species, it is not harmful to the species as long as a sufficient breeding population is maintained.
I understand that this is by no means a flowery or romantic description, but we have to make one thing perfectly clear… we are talking about natural law here, so we have to reduce the concept to its most basic components.
Now let’s move on to the other half of the analogy… “the laws governing atoms”. What exactly are the laws governing atoms?
The answer is quite simple: THERE ARE NO LAWS “GOVERNING” ATOMS.
There is always a great deal of confusion when we talk about scientific laws. These laws are not some sort of codes imposed by an invisible nether-world government which instruct atoms how to behave. They are the result of our attempts to observe, understand, predict, and explain how atoms behave. The actual behavior of the atoms is, in fact, intrinsic to their nature. They do not think, and therefor do not care, about what these laws are.
So let’s put all of this together and look at exactly why this analogy is ridiculous. Since marriage is a societal construct, its nature is completely dependent on the society defining it. Although many religious fundamentalists may argue that the common “one man and one woman” configuration is the result of natural laws, it is not. It is the result of cultural influence and personal beliefs, and is therefor simply one possible subjective view. As a result, any laws we make defining it are attempts at imposing a single point of view on our society as a whole.
Atoms, on the other hand, simply don’t care what our point of view is. They pay no mind to our religious belief. They don’t sidestep our cultural taboos. If we were to pass a constitutional amendment banning protons from the nucleus, the protons would still be in the nucleus. These “laws” are constant and immutable. Atoms are what they are.
So why did one silly little analogy bother me so much? The answer is simple. In our society, there is far too many examples of theology being presented as something more than it actually is. In this one statement, Mr. Dalrymple has attempted to blur the lines between politics, science, and religious belief, stating his personal theological views as immutable fact.
While I don’t agree with his personal beliefs, I can at least respect his right to hold them. I cannot, however, respect his attempts to present theology as anything more than it is… mythology and dogma.
To paraphrase a popular t-shirt slogan, “Don’t bring your faith into our science, and we won’t think in your church.”
AFA brings out one “Heck” of a straw man
May 11th
It’s always loads of fun to see the American Family Association take on the world of science. It’s one of their three natural enemies (the other two being some hideous phantasm known as “the gay agenda” and basic common sense).
Today, they treated us to an astute criticism of evolutionary immunology by a gentleman named Peter Heck. I naturally assumed that he was one of Ken Ham’s lackeys from Answers in Genesis… but it turns out that Mr. Heck is the host of a two hour right wing Christian radio talk show in Kokoma, Indiana.
His article, entitled “Darwinists’ swine flu science”, attempts to critique an article in Live Science magazine which explains how evolutionary science is critical in understanding the evolution of a virus (as if one would use any other sort of science to understand the evolution of an organism).
I began to read the article and was treated to one of the most epic opening paragraphs ever written. Mind you, it wasn’t epic because it was powerfully written. It wasn’t epic because it made a valid point. It was epic because I believe it set a new world record…
The number of straw men one can cram into a few short sentences.
I present this paragraph to you, in all of its strawy goodness (please… no open flames within the vicinity of this paragraph).
It never ceases to amaze me how intellectually condescending evolutionary naturalists can be. Keep in mind, these are folks who believe that an indescribably tiny wad of nothingness exploded into a fully functional, structured, and ordered universe of orbiting planets and complex creatures without any supernatural agency involved. They are the ones who cling to a theory known as spontaneous generation – the notion that dead matter can just suddenly pop to life. They are the ones who champion a man (Charles Darwin) who suggested that Africans were more closely related to gorillas than Caucasians. They are the ones who believe that a wolf-like animal with hooves took to the water, lost its legs, and morphed into a whale (Cetaceans). If anyone should go easy on the intellectual condescension, it’s these people. But they don’t.
First of all… he makes the statement that we believe that “an indescribably tiny wad of nothingness exploded into a fully functional, structured, and ordered universe of orbiting planets and complex creatures without any supernatural agency involved.” This is one of the most intellectually dishonest statements I have ever read. Notice that he begins with an incredibly glib description of the Big Bang theory, then quickly goes on to imply that we claim that every other natural process, from the formation of stars to the evolution of complex organisms, just happened randomly from there. I know of no scientists who would make anything even resembling this claim. This is a clear example of the dishonest tactics used by creationists to defcredit science.
He goes on to claim that we cling to the theory of spontaneous generation. Really? We do? That’s odd… I thought that spontaneous generation was an ancient and archaic theory that was finally abandoned after Pasteur’s experiments in the mid 19th century. I assume that he is attempting to cause his readers to confuse spontaneous generation with abiogenesis, the modern field of study which attempts to understand the formation of complex proteins and how they combined to form DNA, leading to our world’s most primitive life forms some 2-3 billion years ago. You don’t need to be a biologist to understand that abiogenesis has absolutely nothing to do with spontaneous generation. You need only read up on the subject and apply a bit of common sense.
Heck then goes on to employ one of the favorite tactics of the creationists… slander Charles Darwin. I’m going to play devil’s advocate on this. For one moment, let’s assume Darwin was a racist. Let’s assume he was the biggest, most bigoted racist who ever lived. What, exactly, would this have to do with his work as a scientist? Would this automatically invalidate his theory of natural selection? No, it wouldn’t. I suppose this tactic is not quite a straw man. It’s more of a red herring… the squirmy little friend of the straw man.
Of course, I was by no means conceding that Darwin was a racist. In reality, he saw little distinction between the so-called races of humans, arguing that there was often more diversity within a race than between races. An excellent critique of the “Darwin was a racist” idea can be found at http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/darwin_nazism.htm
So… are we “intellectually condescending”? At times, yes. I will not even attempt to argue this point. However, I would like to point out that we don’t start out that way. We become condescending when faced with absurdity masquerading as science. We become condescending when people base their knowledge of the universe on the mythological ramblings of Bronze Age scribes.
And we certainly become condescending when conservative Christian talk show hosts spew forth a heady mixture of straw men, red herrings, and pseudo-science.
Thank you, Peter Heck. Thank you for making our job so damn easy. Thank you for providing such a brilliant example of everything that is wrong with contaminating science with religious thought.
Although it doesn’t spontaneously generate form the back end of a bull, it certainly does from the mouths of the religious right.
Neil deGrasse Tyson is coming to Philly!!!
Feb 23rd
I suppose “normal” people get excited by getting the chance to meet their favorite bands, athletes, or actors.
If, on the other hand, you’re a nerdy atheist in his mid thirties, you squeal like a little girl when you find out that astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson will appearing at the Free Library of Philadelphia.
For those of you who don’t know who Neil deGrasse Tyson is (and were too lazy to click the above link)…
Tyson is the director of the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, the host of Nova Science Now! on PBS, and an author. In short, he has devoted his professional life to promoting scientific literacy among the general population.
The state of science education in our society has been quite bleak for some time now. The United States consistently trails behind other industrialized nations in terms of scientific literacy. This lack of knowledge among the general population has created a vacuum which is eagerly filled by pseudo-scientific frauds like Ken Ham, Kent Hovind, and Jenny McCarthy. Their proliferation of bad science continues to compound the level of ignorance of the American people.
This is why men like Neil Tyson are so vitally important in today’s world. Tyson is a brilliant individual with a wide range of knowledge on all things scientific. Not only does he possess this knowledge, but he has an amazing ability to relay this information in a manner that is informal, friendly, and fun… an ability which is sadly lacking among most great scientific minds.
Obvious parallels have been drawn between Tyson and the late Carl Sagan. Although I’ve always had a great personal affinity for Sagan’s work, I feel that Tyson has a greater ability to convey knowledge in a format which is accessible to everyone. I could spend hours listening to Sagan’s slow, methodical, philosophical meanderings… but I can certainly see how he could lull many people to sleep. Tyson is more of a scientist of the people. It’s easy to imagine sitting in a bar with him while he explains the Big Bang Theory using salt shakers, a beer mug, and napkins as props.
Tyson’s “Death By Black Hole” is one of my favorite books. It is an anthology of his articles compiled in a format that provides a great deal of information about astrophysics, and it requires little to no previous knowledge of the subject to pick up, understand, and enjoy. It is an excellent primer for anyone who wants to learn a bit about our universe, and it’s still an enjoyable read for people that already have some knowledge of the material.
I encourage everyone to check out Nail deGrasse Tyson’s work, and head out to the Central Branch of the Free Library of Philadelphia on Tuesday, March 3rd to hear him speak. I assure you that you won’t be sorry!

Darwin Day and the march of the fundies
Feb 13th
I have been a bit preoccupied with other things as of late, so I haven’t had the time to maintain and update this blog as much as I would like to.
That being said, I want to let everyone know that Penn Museum here in Philadelphia will be holding its annual Darwin Day and Evolution Teach In this Sunday, February 15th. This event is free and open to the public, so I suggest that all of you try to make it. It’s a wonderful museum and a fun activity for the entire family!
On another note, one of my old posts seems to have suddenly attracted some attention from creationists who claim that science has been unable to refute the brilliant theories of pseudo-scientist and convicted felon Kent Hovind. Please feel free to visit the post and leave all of your happy little links to actual scientific sites that illustrate just how “brilliant” Hovind’s ramblings… uh, I mean… “theories”… are!
Original post: “Kent Hovind… a martyr?”
ALERT: PBS to air program with FACTUAL INFORMATION!!!
Jul 22nd
Oh, the HUMANITY!!!
Our worst fears have come true, ladies and gentlemen. We are precariously perched at the brink of oblivion, staring headlong into the abyss. The satanic liberals of academia are prepared to use the venerable PBS program “Nova” to do the unthinkable…
Use legitimate scientific and historical research to present the TRUTH about the Bible!
Please, I beg of you… Please remain calm. Step away from the window. Put down the gun. Pull your head out of the oven. There is still hope, my friends… the AFA has released an action alert to stop this sanity!
They have provided a short sampling of the evil truths Nova plans to present…
• The Old Testament was written in the sixth century BC and hundreds of authors contributed.
• Abraham, Sarah and their offspring didn’t exist.
• There is no archaeological evidence of the Exodus.
• Monotheism was a process that took hundreds of years.
• The Israelites were actually Canaanites.
• The Israelites believed that God had a wife.
It’s bad enough that PBS has used programs like Sesame Street to brainwash our children into believing that “A” is for “Apple” and that 2 + 2 = 4, but now they have the unmitigated gall to challenge the historical accuracy of mythology! Next they will be teaching our youth that thunder is the result of millions of rapidly heated gas molecules spontaneously breaking the sound barrier and not the sound of Thor’s mighty hammer striking a cosmic anvil.
I remember the deleterious effect PBS had on me as a child. They filled my impressionable mind with a variety of wicked facts that contradicted the Bible…
- The Earth orbits the Sun, and neither one of them is located at the center of the Universe
- Human beings cannot walk on water without the assistance of some sort of flotation device
- Illness is caused by microbes, not by a vengeful deity
- The Earth is BILLIONS of years old
- Dinosaurs and humans were separated by tens of millions of years
It is clear that we cannot allow this government funded assault on irrational and delusional ideas continue. Please follow the example set by the American Family Association and DEMAND that congress stop spending our tax dollars on educating the populace.
If this continues, our children are in danger of catching up with the children of all other industrialized nations. We can NEVER let this happen.
Remember… Ignorance is power!
University of PA Darwin Day celebration Feb. 10th
Feb 8th
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA MUSEUM OFFERS SECOND ANNUAL FREE DARWIN DAY AND EVOLUTION TEACH IN SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1:00 TO 4:00 P.M.
Museum Part of International “Darwin Day” Birthday Celebration Activities
Leading Up to 200th Anniversary of the Evolution Theorist’s Birth in 2009

PHILADELPHIA, PA—Sunday, February 10, 2008, 1:00 to 4:00 p.m., the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology offers it’s second annual Darwin Day and Evolution Teach In, a free event held in honor of the 199th birthday of Charles Robert Darwin, the world-renowned author of On the Origin of Species—and the originator of the modern theory of evolution.
The free day features short “teach in” talks in galleries by renowned experts, a “sneak preview” of Penn Museum’s upcoming exhibition, “Surviving, The Body of Evidence,” and a physical anthropologist’s corner with plaster casts of hominid skulls and other bones. WHYY TV co-sponsors two showings of a recent NOVA documentary, and the Academy of Natural Sciences joins in with show and tell of memorabilia related to Darwin’s membership at that esteemed institution. An ongoing children’s workshop, a scavenger hunt, free birthday cake and the opportunity to play some badminton, reputedly a favorite game of Darwin’s, are also part of the afternoon. Darwin himself (or a reasonable likeness) promises to make an appearance to enjoy the festivities, delivering short, impromptu readings of excerpts from his many writings.
“Darwin’s theory of evolution has dramatically changed the way people study and think about our world,” said Dr Richard Hodges, the Williams Director of Penn Museum. “Penn Museum is delighted, once again, to offer up this free, fun and educational event, joining in spirit with an international chorus of classroom teachers, museums, universities and other organizations celebrating the life and achievements of Charles Darwin, whose official birthday is February 12.”
University of Pennsylvania faculty and alumni from several disciplines are participating in the teach-in, offering attendees a variety of perspectives on the study of evolution and human origins. Dr. Michael Weisberg, Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Chair of Penn Museum’s Evolution Project, provides introductions to the speakers. The following experts offer short lectures:
• Dr. Louise Krasniewicz, Senior Research Scientist, American Section, Penn Museum:
“Whose Creation Is This? Origin Myths from Around the World” (1:15 p.m.)
• Dr. John Tresch, Assistant Professor, History and Sociology of Science:
“Darwin’s Story”
• Dr. Michael Weisberg, Assistant Professor of Philosophy:
“Evolution and the Environment”
• Eric Rothschild and Steve Harvey, Partners, Pepper Hamilton LLP. Mr. Rothschild is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Mr. Rothschild and Mr. Harvey were co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, the landmark “intelligent design” case:
“Evolution in the Courts: The Story in 2008” (3:30 p.m.)
Darwin Day visitors are invited to a “sneak preview” of Penn Museum’s upcoming exhibition, Surviving, the Body of Evidence, opening April 19, 2008. Developed with a major grant from the National Science Foundation, Surviving will take the visitor on a journey of discovery to find out how the process of evolution and its outcomes have had a profound impact on human life today. Dr. Janet Monge, Keeper of the Museum’s Physical Anthropology section and co-curator of the new exhibition, offers a presentation of some of the special video and interactive features employed to draw the visitor into the experience.
The Museum is home to the world’s largest repository of high-quality casts of hominid fossils, which provide an important teaching tool for educators at Penn and around the world. The event features a special Physical Anthropology corner with hands-on examples of important fossil casts of hominids from three million years ago to 100,000 years ago. Visitors can handle the casts and learn about some of the ways that physical anthropologists study the evidence for evolutionary change over time.
WHYY TV sponsors two showings of the recent NOVA documentary, Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial in the Museum’s Rainey Auditorium at 1 p.m. and again at 3 p.m. Judgment Day details the events leading up to and concluding with the landmark case of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. Eric Rothschild, a partner with Pepper Hamilton LLP and a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and Steve Harvey, also a partner with Pepper Hamilton, were co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs in the case, which was decided in the plaintiff’s favor in December 2005, and an actor portrays them in some courtroom reconstructions. The case has been referred to as a modern-day “Monkey Trial,” alluding to the famous State v. John Scopes trial of 1925, when a jury was asked to decide the fate of a high school biology teacher charged with illegally teaching the theory of evolution.
The publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species or The Descent of Man revolutionized scientific thinking on evolution. Visitors have an opportunity to hear excerpts of these books and other Darwin writings, as read by Charles Darwin (or a reasonable likeness) himself. On the Origin of Species, and other books by and about Darwin and evolution will be on sale—(and 10% off)—in the Museum Shop for the day. Visitors who join the Museum at Darwin Day will receive a FREE copy of On the Origin of Species.
Children and families can discover more about evolution with a hands-on, large-scale “Tree of Life” mural project. To provide a wider perspective on the many ways that we humans have understood our beginnings, visitors of all ages can follow a specially designed “Origins” scavenger hunt through several galleries featuring cultural materials from around the world.
A supreme Naturalist, Darwin was especially intrigued by the unique life forms that developed in relative isolation on the Galapagos Islands. Local artist Emmy Krick, visiting Galapagos with books about Darwin’s journey tucked in her pocket, became enamoured of the “little monsters” of the islands, the Galapagos Marine Iguanas, and she shares originals monoprints, and information, at the event. The Academy of Natural Sciences adds to a general appreciation of the life and work of its most famous member, with books, letters and other items that were part of Darwin’s daily routine.
To make the celebration complete, there will be a birthday cake for Darwin, with free pieces for everyone—including Charles Darwin himself—while they last. Darwin enjoyed taking a break from his work on occasion, and badminton was a game of choice. Visitors can take a lecture-break at the badminton set up in the Children’s Lunchroom.
The Museum Café serves up a (non-alcoholic) “Darwin Punch” and offers a Galapagos 2008 lunch menu for the afternoon.
Penn Museum’s Darwin Day and Evolution Teach In is coordinated by Dr. Michael Weisberg, chair of the Museum’s Evolution Project.
A growing list of other Darwin Day events held at other museums and educational institutions nationally is available online at http://www.darwinday.org
The University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology is dedicated to the study and understanding of human history and diversity. Founded in 1887, the Museum has sent more than 400 archaeological and anthropological expeditions to all the inhabited continents of the world. With an active exhibition schedule and educational programming for children and adults, the Museum offers the public an opportunity to share in the ongoing discovery of humankind’s collective heritage.
Penn Museum is located at 3260 South Street (across from Franklin Field), Philadelphia, PA 19104. Museum hours are Tuesday through Saturday, 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; Sunday 1 to 5 p.m. Closed Mondays and holidays. Admission donation is $8 for adults; $5 for senior citizens and students with ID; free to members, PENNcard holders, and children 6 and under. www.museum.upenn.edu. For general information call 215/898-4000.
Nick Sagan shares memories of his father
Dec 21st
Today, a friend referred me to the blog of Nick Sagan, son of Carl Sagan.
This week marked the eleventh anniversary of Carl’s untimely passing. Many individuals around the world who were touched by his work payed tribute to him in blogs and articles.
I read many of these wonderful tributes, but none can quite match the window into Carl’s life provided by his son.
I have provided links to two of these posts. Enjoy!
“Memories of my dad” (posting from December, 2006)
